This section considers the practical steps that are typically taken before, during and after a sweep of data collection for a longitudinal study.
This section considers the practical steps that are typically taken before, during and after a sweep of data collection for a longitudinal study.
Prior to data collection, the study sweep will typically have to undergo an ethical review, often via a Research Ethics Committee.
The purpose of the review is to ensure that the research is carried out in an ethical manner. It covers a wide range of issues relating to the study and its implementation. In relation to longitudinal studies, a review would typically consider the following areas:
Surveys commonly ‘pre-test’ new questions to make sure that they are clear to study participants. The most common way for longitudinal studies to do this is to carry out ‘pilot tests’. These involve administering all or some of the data collection instruments to a group of participants to identify any problems with particular instruments or questions.
Some longitudinal studies use existing study participants to test their questions. This has the advantage of meaning that questions are tested on precisely the group of interest, but risks over-burdening them and increasing the chance that they drop out of the main study. Some studies overcome this by recruiting a sample of people just for the purposes of pre-testing.
Understanding Society has taken a different approach to pre-testing, using what it calls an ‘Innovation Panel’. This is a separate panel of 1,500 households used to test new and innovative ways of collecting data.
The nature of data collection or ‘fieldwork’ will depend on the interview mode being used, and will vary in detail from study to study.
Typically, participants are sent an ‘advance letter’ to let them know about the upcoming sweep and give them details about what happens next.
If the sweep uses interviewers, they need to be briefed and trained. These briefings normally cover the purpose of the research, the administrative procedures the interviewers should follow, and the content of the data collection instruments.
Progress is closely monitored during fieldwork, with two key measures being:
To encourage as high a response rate as possible, some longitudinal studies offer participants a small ‘thank you’ for taking part (usually referred to as an incentive). These typically take the form of vouchers.
Once the fieldwork is underway, data preparation can begin. If paper questionnaires have been used, the results will have to be scanned or manually keyed so that they are in digital form.
Two key features of data preparation are editing and coding:
Before the dataset is finalised, it will be reviewed to ensure that it has been adequately anonymised. This includes, for example, removing any verbatim responses that could disclose someone’s identity (for example, if they mention having a very unusual job). Serial numbers are used instead of names, and in longitudinal studies the serial numbers are used to link datasets from different sweeps together.
The procedures governing access to study data vary from study to study.
Data from studies funded by the Economic and Social Research Council are deposited at the UK Data Service, where they are made available to bona fide researchers under a licence agreement.
Studies funded by the Medical Research Council require researchers to apply directly to the study team to access the data. The application procedures are different for every study.
Visit the CLOSER website for a complete list of the data access arrangements of the CLOSER studies.
The Learning Hub is a resource for students and educators
tel | +44 (0)20 7331 5102 |
---|---|
closer@ucl.ac.uk |
Sign up for our email newsletters to get the latest from CLOSER
Sign up